Founding Fathers Budget Views. Best Page Story Click Here
Update Material Goes Here Challenge your Thinking
Freedom of information center,,,, link below
http://foi.missouri.edu/usenergypolicies/whatoilwants.html
In the middle of the Book of Revelation a Quote is Declaired,
"hurt not the oil and the wine" !
What Does Big Oil Want in the Middle
of All the Nations Listed in the Battle of Armageddon
In Iraq, it hopes to own the black gold, 1/3 of all supply in the world, and to write the rules of the game, too !
Gas prices have more than doubled yet the Iraq oil fields are now producing twice the amount than before Halberton rebuilt and manages. ExxonMobil, ChevronTexaco, Shell and BP and OPEC met and decided hold back the oil supply.
By Daphne Eviatar
What does big oil want in Iraq? To regain influence over the great Middle East oilfields, from which Western companies were expelled four decades ago.
THE JOCKEYING HAS already begun, and the race seems likely to be won by American and British firms: ExxonMobil, ChevronTexaco, Shell and BP. According to industry insiders, these giants are now the front runners in part because British and American troops are likely to end up in control of Baghdad, which can’t help but influence Iraq’s choice of business partners. More important, the world’s largest private oil companies are the only ones that can afford both to restore Iraqi oil production, which is now running at under half its 6 million-barrel-per-day capacity, and to develop its vast untapped fields. To protect the tens of billions they will need to pour into a postwar Iraq, the oil giants are likely to push a controversial form of contract that gives them an ownership stake in the oilfields and guaranteed relief from national tax and environmental laws for the life of the project. So far, oil companies have won these deals, known as production-sharing agreements (PSAs), mainly in weak states that don’t know better than to give away the store—but never in the big Middle Eastern countries. “The issue is not oil per se, but ultimately having the large international oil companies change the terms of their involvement in the region” through production-sharing agreements, says Saudi oil and security analyst Nawaf Obaid.
In a sense, Big Oil would like to turn the clock back to a time before the great wave of nationalizations in the 1970s, when global —giants known as the “seven sisters” were pushed out of much of the Middle East and Latin America. Today, all the world’s largest oil producers are state monopolies, which control the vast bulk of the most easily accessible fields from Saudi Arabia to Mexico. Private giants like ExxonMobil often get stuck with shaky service contracts, and they own reserves only in their home country or in ever more remote and dangerous regions, from the deep sea to Central Asia. Given the risks, oil companies began searching for ways to create as much long-term stability as they could get, and that’s where the production-sharing agreements first came in, shortly after the nationalizations began.
By Daphne Eviatar
Newsweek
March 24, 2003.
Posted on March 22, 2003 @ 10:34AM.
Founding Fathers & Government Budget
Government used to cost Americans 4%-9% of its GDP.
Now it costs 38-44%. Some argue that it really costs over
60% of our National Budget.
Does the government grow faster than economy ?
You decide, go to; Go to Federal Budgets and see the statistics.
What did the founding fathers think about the costs of Government
Stated (from the Federalist Papers of 1787, Alexander Hamilton, etc. - see famous quotes), the framers
of our Constitution outlined but four (4) core reasons for forming a federal
government: (1) national defense, (2) preservation of peace between states
(civil wars, riots), (3) regulation of trade between states & with other
nations, and (4) international relations. (note > 'national defense' was
listed as #1 - - thereby being the priority).
If successful in carrying out those principles,
it was believed the 'welfare' of citizens would be assured. (note - this was
their meaning of the word 'welfare', not income redistribution and
entitlements). As further evidence of original intent, for the following
1 ½ centuries the federal government stuck by those principled reasons, and by
the late 1920s was still consuming/controlling only about 3% of national income
(the economic pie). Taxation was used only to pay those bills. Such principles
did not include such items as social welfare, entitlements and income
re-distribution functions. We were a nation that used government primarily only
for those 4 principles, relying on ourselves for all other needs.
Additionally, the founders were against
debt. At the writing of the constitution they were concerned about debt
incurred to finance the Revolutionary War; and it was their intention to pay
off debt, using excise taxes on imports. Alexander Hamilton (federalist #7)
called for the 'extinguishment of all debt'. Later, Jefferson wrote
""I place economy among the first and most important of republican
virtues, and public debt as the greatest of the dangers to be feared."
Back to Top Contents
Check it yourself (it changes daily),
at the U.S. Treasury Department web site.
At that site be sure to read their fantastic link, While we were sleeping...
One Billion Minutes Ago
A big number. Did you know what year it was just a billion minutes ago?
Can you believe, it adds up to 94 A.D. ! Go to your scientific calculator multiply the number of minutes in a day.
Then times 365 days a year. Then multiply years till you reach ONE BILLION MINUTES
The opposite of fiscal responsibility
Now try to picture the size of a TRILLION. Then 7.5 TRILLION
Picture someone taking your check book and
writing checks beyond what you had in your savings till you were 7.5 Trillion in debt.
And debt service people were knocking on your door
wanting 400 Billion in cash every year
Would you be upset, you should be !
|
 |
Below is one of our favorite sites. Study the facts, draw your own conclusions. NATIONAL DEBT AWARENESS CENTER
Updated 15 May 2004
The National Debt is $7.5+
Trillion!
Check it yourself (it changes daily), at the U.S. Treasury Department web site.
While we were sleeping...
Nations being Lied to by BIGGER CORPORATIONS
Mark Lawson at the
Guardian notes that the generals are already leading the journalists for a merry dance -- a la Norman Schwartzkopf -- tricking them into spreading misinformation that serves their needs. The most recent example: the report that Saddam's men dressed in U.S. and British military uniforms will massacre their own civilians.
Great Outside the Box Links
Check it yourself (it changes daily),
at the U.S. Treasury Department web site.
At that site be sure to read their fantastic link, While we were sleeping...
|